Global Warming Merits Widespread Moral Outrage Essay -- Climate Change,

Global Warming Disaster Merits Widespread Moral Outrage    Global warming will take its toll of human life to the tune of hundreds of thousands every year. According to John Broome--the Chair of Moral Philosophy at Oxford--these unfortunate victims of society's next big challenge will die by three main causes: heat waves, expansion of tropical diseases to temperate latitudes, and increased flooding. And yet many of my fellow EEB (ecology and evolutionary biology) grad students felt that the direct loss of life was a pittance in comparison with the indirect effects of global warming, such as the loss of ecosystem services caused by the devastation of the natural world and the social turmoil associated with the inundation of the many millions of homes by the rising oceans.    There are three paradoxes to the politics of global change, which together can only lead to the conclusion that the US government's stance is horrendously unjust. The Bush stance to which I'm referring is the recent decision to withdraw completely from negotiations for the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol. By this international treaty, the Clinton administration had agreed to limit US emissions of CO2--the largest anthropogenic contributor to global warming--to 7% less than 1990 levels by 2007. Bush's decision directly contradicted an explicit campaign promise to limit national emissions of air pollutants including carbon dioxide. This monumental decision enraged EU leaders and humiliated EPA director (ex-NJ Governor) Christie Whitman, who had just stated publicly that Bush would implement the Kyoto Protocol.    The first paradox is that Bush's justification of the decision is that the Protocol is unfair to US because it does not explic... ... spend thousands of dollars to prevent their children contracting malaria as the plasmodium-carrying mosquitoes spread North? And what are we going to tell the many millions of Bangladeshis who will soon lose their lowland communities? I am going to tell them that I am deeply sorry, and that I fought the good fight. I will tell them that I refused to act as an apologist for indefensible American policies. I will tell them that I refused to partake in discussion of the finer points of emissions trading or carbon sink credits without first pointing out that the very basis for discussion is deeply unjust. This Earth Day, I am making a resolution not to legitimize Bush's despicable climate change position by accepting the paradoxical assumptions upon which it is based. I invite you to join me--for the sake of future generations and disenfranchised people everywhere.

Human Rights and Present Human Freedom

Freedom is a concept that refers to many aspects of human life. I believe that is defined as the ability that people have to do or not something, and do it in a way or another. I also believe that is possible to understand freedom as that state in which a man is not being imprisoned or enslaved by another; it is a concept that refers to all aspects related to independence. This concept is something that has made us think in many ways, because many times, the do what we want, can take us to the wrong path, which may end up making us lose it.Since the beginning of man to the present human freedom has played an important role in it but not the way we wanted to remember. A great example was Egypt; there existed on the banks of the Nile an extreme amount of slaves that contributed to the creation of the same. What I mean is that human freedom has been leaving a mark very strong throughout man's existence but erroneously because it is not characterized by the excess of it, on the contrary, is characterized by its absence.Slavery is not a story of the past, it is true that it was practiced more frequently in it but even in our times can be found slaves, this slavery can be accepted or not, for the slave. There are several types of freedom, among which are the freedom of expression, that is based in that every human being has the right to free speech, this is a right that I believe that we are only ones can make it count because we are responsible to find ways of how we want to express.Also, freedom of opinion that says that we live in a democratic world so we have the right to give our opinions, regardless of whether it is our view and we are free to make it known; freedom of worship which is based on that we all come from a family with religious beliefs that we learn from childhood, and society teaches us that there are many more religions that we have to accept equally, and that each individual has the freedom to choose and defend their beliefs.The freedom of choice each individual has to choose freely what they want without having anything to stop them doing that and the latest, freedom of decision which states that each person is the only responsible who can decide what does or does not do with his life.As Charles Evans Hughes said, â€Å"When we lose the right to be different, we lose the privilege to be free†. Freedom is an instrument double-edged, means to do what you want, while not against human nature; to regulate this freedom there are laws, which are the rules from the order is born so no one has  more freedom than other, and nobody thinks that their freedom is more valuable than another. It is double-edged because this is the same trap that should not escape, and being a runaway freedom means being taken prisoner in bondage, there is his trap, care freedom makes us all prisoners of the slavery of be free, but this brings us the ability to think, speak, hear and do it without fear of being penalized, punished or exterminated .Any other slavery, don ´t. I believe that freedom in general is the lack of limitation for action. This has been present for years in the world, where it has been very important. From my point of view, the greatest attribute of being free is that we always have the decision last us. We can decide and be free to do what we want or what we want it or not oblige.

Free Trade and the Environment Essay - 1003 Words

Free Trade and the Environment Economic Implications of Free Trade Throughout the academic discipline of economics, much attention has been lavished on the purely economic benefits of free trade as opposed to autarky. Economists have argued that both consumer and producer stand to gain from uninhibited international trade. The consumer gains access to greater quantities of a specific good at a more competitive price, while the producer is able to shift his resources into the economy’s comparative-advantage industries. In addition to static gains from trade such as increases in economic well being, free trade brings about dynamic gains as well, which further increase the expand the economic resources of the involved country.†¦show more content†¦The debate in recent years has mainly revolved around the claim that increased trade undermines environmental quality, which has an especially significant effect in lower-income countries. The traditional rebuttal is that free trade allows developing countries to break out of the cycle of pove rty and to increase in economic prosperity, thereby growing out of their environmental problems. It should be apparent that the latter argument is most conducive to free trade, and has thus been harped on by trade advocates, who insist that economic success enables a country to generate the revenue needed to enact stricter environmental regulations. The raw data, which has been subjected to much analysis, can lead to either of the two conclusions; the primary question facing economists thus is one of direct causality. Has free trade ever been a direct cause of improvements or degradations in the environment? Any study of the environment and economics would be remiss not to include a discussion of industrial emission standards and pollution controls, the main instruments through which decisions of environmental economics are most evidently manifested. Often, such regulatory controls are linked to international trade agreements. One of the oldest theories is that due to differentials in environmental regulations among different nations, there will exist â€Å"pollution havens† where firms will move their operations in order to escape tightShow MoreRelated Can We Have Free Trade and Reduce Pollution of the Environment?779 Words   |  4 PagesCan We Have Free Trade and Protect the Environment? nbsp; Endorsing free trade is easy. Ask an Economics professor why free trade is good and you will surelynbsp; be shown a graph with three or more intersecting lines that show a higher rate of output for nations that participate in free trade than nations that do not. Opposing free trade, at least on economic grounds, is a bit harder-unless you are an environmentalist. nbsp; The economic advantages of free trade were recentlyRead MoreThe Role Of The International Trade Environment On A Free Market Type Environment Versus One With Heavy Government Regulations Essay1137 Words   |  5 Pagessustainable share of the benefits of the international trade environment. There is a large contrast between a system operating in a free market type environment versus one with heavy government regulations and intervention. It is important to examine industrial policy, strategic trade policy, trade problems facing developing nations, import substitution and export-led growth. Government Role in Developing Countries with Regard to International Trade Developing countries is a term that has been usedRead MoreFree And Open Trade Policies, Liberal Business Environment And Good Economic Order1855 Words   |  8 PagesBusiness environment Free and open trade policies, liberal business environment and good economic order UAE government always has implemented an open free trade policy; there are no trade quotas, barriers and foreign exchange control and management organizations; no income tax, value added tax, consumption tax and other middle parts of tax, the profits can be freely transfer to anywhere you want. There is 5% tariff for most of commodities except tobacco and liquor, etc. Dollar and theRead MoreGlobalization: A Free Trade Phenomenon Essay866 Words   |  4 Pages Globalization is â€Å"the integration of states through increasing contact, communication and trade to create a holistic, single global system in which the process of change increasingly binds people together in a common fate† (Carey 2002). Some economists recognize globalization as being in the best interest of all states. While others believe that increasingly liberated trade and global economic interaction is necessary in many ways. While globalization marks a move toward a more open world-tradingRead MoreInt ernational Political Market Values And Subsequent Free Trade Agreements869 Words   |  4 PagesIn relations, international liberal market values and subsequent free trade agreements are at the forefront of economic globalization. As the global markets and economic competition intensifies, nations move towards trade liberalization. International trade agreements by extension of economic globalization are more often prioritized before environmental agreements. In fact it is evident that environmental policy is rarely prioritized over economic growth. The neo-liberal market ideals have encouragedRead MorePros and Cons of Free Trade1495 Words   |  6 PagesGeography: Pros and Cons of Free Trade Few can contend that the world is more interconnected and interrelated more than ever. This web of interdependency is primarily made possible by trade, and in the twenty-first century, a large and significant portion of trade is conducted on a global scale. Furthermore, while the majority of people agree that free trade can benefit both parties in terms of economic development and an increase in overall production, many critics have voiced their fears of theRead MoreShould Free Trade Be Allowed?904 Words   |  4 PagesAllowing free trade to happen will allow many benefits like having larger varieties of goods and services for a lower price, growth for the economy and as well as increased exports for producers. Free trade will especially help the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a free trade agreement among 12 countries that border the Pacific Ocean. The countries included in the are: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, New Zealand, Vietnam, and the United States.The benefits ofRead MoreThese Concerns Will Be Addressed In The Next Paragraph.1547 Words   |  7 Pagesnumber of countries, which are not currently self sufficient, do have to rely on trade to meet food requirements such as nations in North Africa (D’Odorico et al. 2014). Additionally, in the same study, it was determined that trade, in the majority of cases did not cause a loss of sufficiency, and more often played a beneficial role to nations. Especially in an environment today, a number of nations are becoming more trade dependent to meet basic food needs, especially nations traditionally viewed asRead MoreInternational Factors and Multinational Corporations1724 Words   |  7 PagesRegional Trade Agreements and Global trade liberalization are common terms that are used to analyze different market structures in the market. According to international economics, RTAs (Regional Trading Agreements) are the agreements in which members give each another privil eged treatment with respect to the extent by which the trade barriers have been established. On the other side, Global Trade liberalization is a general term referring to the depletion of trade boundaries globally to ensure freeRead MoreFree Trade And Trade Agreements1408 Words   |  6 PagesFree Trade Free trade is a policy in which the government does not interfere against imports or impedes with exports by applying tariffs (Encyclopedia, 2015). Free trade is about removing barriers like tariffs, quotas, and other restrictions. Tariffs are taxes that the countries enforce on imported goods and services, they are set in place to make trade harder. This ultimately causes the price of goods and services for consumers to be more expensive. Quotas are a limited quantity countries put